Measure that limits how some health care providers spend revenue outside of patient care holds slim lead
A California ballot initiative related to how health care providers that participate in a federal prescription drug discount program spend their revenue is carrying a slim lead heading into Wednesday morning. As of 11 p.m. Tuesday night, the measure held a slim lead of 51.1% in favor and 48.9% opposed. Prop 34 would restrict those providers from spending the revenue in ways that “don’t directly benefit patients,” supporters said. The restrictions would affect health care providers who have spent more than $100 million in ten years on things that aren’t specifically patient care. Those that meet that requirement would be required to spend almost all of their revenue from the federal prescription drug plan exclusively on patient care. Supporters have billed the proposal as a pro-patient, anti-waste measure. Opponents, meanwhile, have called the initiative intentionally confusing to obfuscate its darker purpose. The Los Angeles Times editorial board, which encouraged voters to vote no on Prop 34, called it a “Revenge Measure.” The initiative’s biggest backer is the California Apartment Association, a lobby group for residential landlords, who have feuded with the AIDS Healthcare Foundation for