Editorial: We sued OpenAI to stop its exploitation of our work
There is no artificial intelligence without the vast trove of human knowledge. Today’s generative AI applications were built on a foundation of such information, drawn from across the internet and from various databases totaling, according to at least one estimate, somewhere around 300 billion words. That’s a lot of intellectual property, much of it produced by generations of professional writers, honed and polished by editors and sent out into the world by publishers in newspapers, magazines, books and more. Hard to put an exact price on such a thing or even to measure the collective value of such an incredible library. It definitely should not be free. But that’s the assumption made by OpenAI when it claims that its use of all this data, much of which it acknowledges was subject to various copyrights, is fair use and did not require compensation to the original creators and owners of that knowledge and information. If you walked into a bookstore and stole not just some of the books, but all of the books, that would be a crime, right? That’s why newspapers, including this one, as